| 835 | 7 | 29 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
基于生物生态学理论视角，采用欺诈易感性、领悟社会支持、多元认知能力、情绪智力、家庭关怀度指数和金融知识等问卷开展调查，运用统计方法分析比较老年人与中青年人金融欺诈易感性现状与影响因素。结果显示：老年人金融欺诈易感性水平高于中青年人；老年组内金融欺诈易感性水平因学历、收入水平而异；与中青年人相比，老年人金融欺诈易感性影响因素差异较大，家庭功能与朋友社会支持等社会性因素具有显著影响，而情绪智力与金融知识的影响不显著。研究提示，防范金融诈骗应聚焦老年人群体特征，充分认识家庭建设的重要性与紧迫性，改变以往金融知识为主的授课、宣导方式。
Abstract：The psychological mechanism of financial fraud involving the elderly was studied based on the frame work of Bronfenbrenner's bioecological theory of human development in the paper. The questionnaires of susceptibility to scams,perceived social support scale(PSSS),multiple ability self-report questionnaire(MASQ), Schutte self-report emotional intelligence scale(SSEIS), family APGAR(adaptation,partnership,growth,affection and resolve)index,financial literacy and necessary statistical methods were used to analyze the current situation and factors influencing financial fraud susceptibility and to compare its differences between the elderly and the young and middle-aged. The results showed that elder's susceptibility to financial fraud were higher than that of the young and middle-aged, and also varied with different educational backgrounds and income levels. The research also found that the influencing factors on elder's susceptibility to financial fraud were different with that on the young and middle-aged;among the influencing factors,the social factors such as family function and friend social support were significant,while the emotional intelligence or financial knowledge was not significant. The research suggested that the prevention of financial fraud should focus on fully mastering the characteristics of the elderly group,understanding the importance and urgency of family construction and revising the previous financial coaching and propaganda methods mainly based on financial knowledge.
[1] BURNES D,HENDERSON JR C R,SHEPPARD C,et al. Prevalence of financial fraud and scams among older adults in the United States:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. American Journal Public Health,2017,107(8):1295.
[2] FENGE L A,LEE S. Understanding the risks of financial scams as part of elder abuse prevention[J]. British Journal Social Work,2018,48(4):906-923.
[3] SPRENG R N,KARLAWISH J,MARSON D C. Cognitive,social,and neural determinants of diminished decisionmaking and financial exploitation risk in aging and dementia:A review and new model[J]. Journal Elder Abuse Neglect,2016,28(4-5):320-344.
[4] GORNEY R,CASSIDY-EAGLE E,SMITH K. Easy money:Financial scams and older adults[J]. American Journal Geriatric Psychiatry,2020,28(4):S6.
[5] JAMES B D,BOYLE P A,BENNETT D A. Correlates of susceptibility to scams in older adults without dementia[J].Journal Elder Abuse Neglect,2014,26(2):107-122.
[6] NORRIS G,BROOKES A,DOWELL D. The psychology of internet fraud victimisation:A systematic review[J].Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology,2019,34(3):231-245.
[7]李舒彤.基于问卷和文本分析的易受骗人群心理特征及预测模型：认知特点、人格与金钱动机的作用[D].杭州：浙江大学，2021:3-4.
[8] BRONFENBRENNER U, MORRIS P A. The bioecological model of human development[M]//DAMON W,LERNER R M. Handbook of child psychology,Vol. 1:Theoretical models of human development. New York:Wiley,2006:793-828.
[9] MATHER M. A review of decision-making processes:Weighing the risks and benefits of aging[M]//CARSTENSEN L L,HARTEL C R. When I′m 64. Washington D C:National Academies Press,2006:145-173.
[10] KOUTSTAAL W. Older adults encode-but do not always use-perceptual details:Intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments[J]. Psychological Science,2003,14(2):189-193.
[11] MATA R,VON HELVERSEN B,RIESKAMP J. Learning to choose:Cognitive aging and strategy selection learning in decision making[J]. Psychological Aging,2010,25(2):299-309.
[12] SCHEIBE S,NOTTHOFF N,MENKIN J,et al. Forewarning reduces fraud susceptibility in vulnerable consumers[J].Basic and Applied Social Psychology,2014,36(3):272-279.
[13] MAYER J D,SALOVEY P,CARUSO D R. Emotional intelligence:New ability or eclectic traits?[J]. American Psychological,2008,63(6):503-517.
[14] BOUZGUENDA K. Emotional intelligence and financial decision making:Are we talking about a paradigmatic shift or a change in practices?[J]. Research in International Business and Finance,2018,44:273-284.
[15] MUELLER E A,WOOD S A,HANOCH Y,et al. Older and wiser:Age differences in susceptibility to investment fraud:The protective role of emotional intelligence[J]. Journal Elder Abuse Neglect,2020,32(2):152-172.
[16] DELIEMA M. Elder fraud and financial exploitation:Application of routine activity theory[J]. Gerontologist,2018,58(4):706-718.
[17] SEGAL M,DORON I,MOR S. Consumer fraud:Older people′s perceptions and experiences[J]. Journal Aging Social Policy,2021,33(1):1-21.
[18]程良莹，张艳，张振香，等.老年人家庭功能评估工具研究进展[J].护理研究，2020,34(4):680-682.
[19] LICHTENBERG P A,SUGARMAN M A,PAULSON D,et al. Psychological and functional vulnerability predicts fraud cases in older adults:Results of a longitudinal study[J]. Clinical Gerontologist,2016,39(1):48-63.
[20]吴捷.老年人社会支持、孤独感与主观幸福感的关系[J].心理科学，2008,31(4):984-986.
[21] LEE J,GEISTFELD L V. Elderly consumers′receptiveness to telemarketing fraud[J]. Journal Public Policy Mark,1999,18(2):208-217.
[22]张林，牟忠琛，刘燊，等.社会支持与老年人受骗倾向的关系：一个有中介的调节模型[J].心理与行为研究，2017,15(6):766-773.
[23]胡振，苏日乐.消费者金融素养研究综述[J].金融与经济，2019,40(10):84-88.
[24] BURKE J,KIEFFER C N,MOTTOLA G R,et al. Can educational interventions reduce susceptibility to financial fraud?[J/OL].(2021-01-14)[2021-03-05]. https：//ssrn. com/abstract=3747165.
[25]童欣，魏豪，叶林山丹，等.提升对特殊消费者群体金融服务水平的思考：以老年群体为例[J].福建金融，2016,31(4):22-26.
[26] BEATON D E,BOMBARDIER C,GUILLEMIN F,et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J]. Spine,2000,25(24):3186-3191.
[27]黄丽，姜乾金.应对方式，社会支持与癌症病人心身症状的相关性研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志，1996,10(4):160-161.
[28]李苗苗，高蕾，张晓翠，等.中文版多元认知能力自评量表的信效度检验[J].中国康复医学杂志，2017,32(11):1236-1240.
[29]黄韫慧，吕爱芹，王垒，等.大学生情绪智力量表的效度检验[J].北京大学学报（自然科学版），2008,44(6):970-976.
[30]吕繁，顾湲.家庭APGAR问卷及其临床应用[J].国外医学（医院管理分册），1995,12(2):56-59.
[31]曹国华，王楠，任成林.认知能力，金融知识与家庭商业保险需求[J].金融论坛，2020,25(12):48-58.
[32]国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京：中国统计出版社，2021.
[33]咸金花，韩布新，刘萍萍.认知功能正常老化的发生时间：早发还是晚发？[J].生物化学与生物物理进展，2015,42(10):900-910.
[34] SALOVEY P,MAYER J D. Emotional intelligence[J]. Imagination,Cognition and Personality,1990,9(3):185-211.
[35]肖健，胡军生，高云鹏.老年心理学[M].北京：北京大学出版社，2013:207.
[36]张皓妍，陈长香，张敏，等.家庭亲子支持对中高龄老年人孤独感影响[J].中国公共卫生，2018,34(2):167-171.
[37] CROSS C.‘They′re very lonely’:Understanding the fraud victimisation of seniors[J]. International Journal of Law Crime and Justice,2016,5(4):60.
[38] ROUSH R,MOYE J,MILLS W,et al. Why clinicians need to know about the elder investment fraud and financial exploitation program[J]. Generations,2012,36(2):94-97.
[39]党俊武，魏彦彦，刘妮娜.中国城乡老年人生活状况调查报告[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社，2018.
(1)采用中国知网学术期刊与硕博论文数据库，检索近20年中文文献，获得相关文献44篇；采用Web of Science核心合集数据库检索近20年英文文献，获得相关文献119篇。
(1)翻译遵循“翻译-综合-回译-专家文化调试与审查”步骤。预调查3周后重测信度为0. 946(P <0. 001)。正式调查项目分析显示题项间鉴别度高、题项与量表总体同质性良好；探索性因子分析提取2因子。此处ω数值采用老年组数据计得，因中青年组计得数值差异在0. 03之内，不再赘述，下同。
基本信息:
中图分类号:C913.6;F832
引用信息:
[1]徐淋琳,韩布新.老年人金融欺诈易感性的影响因素及启示[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2022,51(06):638-645.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金应急管理体系建设研究专项资助项目（20VYJ041）
2022-05-26
2022
2022-06-26
2023-01-02
2023
1
2022-11-15
2022-11-15